http://www.senegambianews.com/article.cfm?articleID=1899
I said I would decide whether the writer is an ignorant retarded dummy OR a dumb ignorant retard. Well, after taking time to think about it, I’ve decided not to call the writer EITHER of the two because that would not be cool of me. I must admit that I was pretty ticked off to read see such a selfish and irresponsible story from a Gambian website but I took time to simmer down before writing. Now mind you, what I have is a blog and I have no problem venting my rage on it. This is not to say that I will accept the same from our NEWSPAPERS. There is a huge difference between a blogger and a newspaper journalist/editor. I chose to write this response in a “chill” tone in the spirit of Ramadan and out of consideration for my readers as well as the journalists and editors I’m addressing. I am NOT obliged to. Anyway, to the article we go.
In bold italics below are direct quotes from the article in questions followed by my commentary.
“Senegambia News hereby pleads with the government of the United States to grant political asylum to any Gambian journalist or political dissident in Banjul or Dakar as our dear country, the Gambia has become a lawless state as evident in the continuous torture, extra-judicial killings, harrasments of civilians and endless arrests and detentions of journalists with impunity.”
A lot of journalists (and some civilians) do have legitimate reasons for wanting to stay away from the current situation in The Gambia. Citizen FM Radio, The Independent Newspaper, Radio 1 FM, the late Deyda Hydara and more recently, Fatou Jaw Manneh, are all evidence of the hostility faced by members of the press that no one has to go through.
As a result, I have no problem whatsoever with Senegambia News, or any Gambian for that matter, trying to secure their immigration status in the status as political refugees in this country. We are all free to seek political asylum for ourselves, friends and family.
What I do have a problem with, is someone going through any means necessary, including disregarding the stability of our country and our national sovereignty just to achieve such individual ends. Yes, I use individual ends because some people will choose to live in country, despite the current circumstances, rather than live elsewhere as refugees or have outsiders interfere. Even some journalists such as the late Deyda Hydara, will feel it is nobler to stay and play their part in effecting changes, even at the ultimate cost, than to flee or neglect the country at its hour of need. Again, it is a matter of personal choice and I don’t blame anyone who seeks asylum for themselves or their families. It is the rest of the article contained in the following quotes that I have a real problem with.
“…we plead with you (
“If this lunatic [Yahya Jammeh] could lay hands on weapons of mass destruction, we bet he will not hesitate to use them against perceived Gambian enemies, British and US citizens around the world. He is more lethal than he appears. It's time he is gotten rid off before it's too late because he has started building alliances with the world's most notorious regimes.”
On this, the first thing I would like to do is to put to rest any notion that I’m even a bit concerned that the USA will actually even consider intervening militarily in Gambian Affairs as requested by Senegambia News. The USA has no interest or stake to interfere in the Gambia. They have lots of more important issues to deal with both within and outside the
For multiple reasons, this article made me wonder if the writer even reads or watches the news. I doubt that anyone following the events in
Wait, I know why
“We want Jammeh out dead or alive to restore democracy and rule of law.”
Am I the only one who sees the irony of this sentence? Does the writer actually believe that the way to restore democracy and the rule of law is to invade a country and remove a sitting president elected by the people of a sovereign nation?
In addition, if Jammeh has committed all the atrocities he is accused of, what justice would there be if you got him dead? Wouldn’t it be more democratic and under the rule of law for you to prosecute him in a court of law and send a message to others that such actions will never go unpunished? I don’t want to call anyone a moron but I’ll say that this sentence is what you call an oxy-“moron” in literature.
Yes my friends,
1 comment:
seriously - where do they get the idiots who write these articles? Their writing is so braindead they make you want to go support the Government, just so you're not associated with them.
Keep up the good work - I'm a big fan of the articles, even when I don't agree with everything they say. Thanks for sharing them.
Post a Comment